1_intro.tex 7.25 KB
Newer Older
1
2
\section{Introduction}
\label{sec:intro}
3

Benoit Viguier's avatar
Benoit Viguier committed
4
5
The Networking and Cryptography library (NaCl)~\cite{BLS12}
is an easy-to-use, high-security, high-speed cryptography library.
Benoit Viguier's avatar
Benoit Viguier committed
6
It uses specialized code for different platforms, which makes it rather complex and hard to audit.
Benoit Viguier's avatar
Benoit Viguier committed
7
8
TweetNaCl~\cite{BGJ+15} is a compact re-implementation in C
of the core functionalities of NaCl and is claimed to be
9
10
11
\emph{``the first cryptographic library that allows correct functionality
to be verified by auditors with reasonable effort''}~\cite{BGJ+15}.
The original paper presenting TweetNaCl describes some effort to support
Peter Schwabe's avatar
Peter Schwabe committed
12
13
this claim, for example, formal verification of memory safety, but does not actually
prove correctness of any of the primitives implemented by the library.
14

Benoit Viguier's avatar
Benoit Viguier committed
15
One core component of TweetNaCl (and NaCl) is the key-exchange protocol X25519 presented
Peter Schwabe's avatar
Peter Schwabe committed
16
17
by Bernstein in~\cite{rfc7748}.
This protocol is standardized in RFC-7748 and used by a wide variety of applications~\cite{things-that-use-curve25519}
Peter Schwabe's avatar
Peter Schwabe committed
18
such as SSH, Signal Protocol, Tor, Zcash, and TLS to establish a shared secret over
19
an insecure channel.
Peter Schwabe's avatar
Peter Schwabe committed
20
The X25519 key-exchange protocol is a an \xcoord only
Peter Schwabe's avatar
Peter Schwabe committed
21
elliptic-curve Diffie-Hellman key-exchange using the Montgomery
Benoit Viguier's avatar
Benoit Viguier committed
22
curve $E: y^2 = x^3 + 486662 x^2 + x$ over the field $\F{\p}$.
Peter Schwabe's avatar
Peter Schwabe committed
23
Note that originally, the name ``Curve25519'' referred to the key exchange protocol,
Peter Schwabe's avatar
Peter Schwabe committed
24
25
but Bernstein suggested to rename the protocol to X25519 and to use the name
Curve25519 for the underlying elliptic curve~\cite{Ber14}.
26
We use this updated terminology in this paper.
27

28
\subheading{Contribution of this paper.}
Peter Schwabe's avatar
Peter Schwabe committed
29
We provide a mechanized formal proof of the correctness of the X25519
Benoit Viguier's avatar
Benoit Viguier committed
30
implementation in TweetNaCl.
Benoit Viguier's avatar
Benoit Viguier committed
31
32
33
34
35
36
This proof is done in three steps:
we first formalize RFC~7748~\cite{rfc7748} in Coq~\cite{coq-faq}.
% This part uses generic techniques to facilitate later proofs.

In a second step we prove equivalence of the C implementation of X25519
to our RFC formalization.
Peter Schwabe's avatar
Peter Schwabe committed
37
This part of the proof uses the Verifiable Software Toolchain (VST)~\cite{2012-Appel}
Benoit Viguier's avatar
Benoit Viguier committed
38
to establish a link between C and Coq.
Peter Schwabe's avatar
Peter Schwabe committed
39
40
41
42
43
44
VST uses Separation logic~\cite{1969-Hoare,Reynolds02separationlogic}
to show that the semantics of the program satisfy a functional specification in Coq.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that
VST is used in the formal proof of correctness of an implementation
of an asymmetric cryptographic primitive.

Benoit Viguier's avatar
Benoit Viguier committed
45
In a last step we prove that the Coq implementation matches
Peter Schwabe's avatar
Peter Schwabe committed
46
47
the mathematical definition of X25519 as given in~\cite[Sec.~2]{Ber06}.
We accomplish this step of the proof by extending the Coq library
Benoit Viguier's avatar
Benoit Viguier committed
48
for elliptic curves~\cite{BartziaS14} by Bartzia and Strub to
Benoit Viguier's avatar
Benoit Viguier committed
49
support Montgomery curves (and in particular Curve25519).
Peter Schwabe's avatar
Peter Schwabe committed
50
This extension may be of independent interest.
Benoit Viguier's avatar
WIP    
Benoit Viguier committed
51

Peter Schwabe's avatar
Peter Schwabe committed
52
\subheading{Related work.}
53
Two methodologies exist to get formal guarantees that software meets its specification.
Peter Schwabe's avatar
Peter Schwabe committed
54
The first is to write a formal specification and then synthesize
Benoit Viguier's avatar
Benoit Viguier committed
55
machine code by refinement; the second is to formalize
Peter Schwabe's avatar
Peter Schwabe committed
56
a specification and then verify that some
Benoit Viguier's avatar
Benoit Viguier committed
57
implementation satisfies it.
Benoit Viguier's avatar
Benoit Viguier committed
58

Benoit Viguier's avatar
Benoit Viguier committed
59
60
% One of the earliest example of this first approach is the
% B-method~\cite{Abrial:1996:BAP:236705} in 1986.
Peter Schwabe's avatar
Peter Schwabe committed
61
The synthesis approach was used by Zinzindohou{\'{e}}, Bartzia, and Bhargavan to build a verified extensible
Benoit Viguier's avatar
Benoit Viguier committed
62
63
64
65
library of elliptic curves~\cite{Zinzindohoue2016AVE} in F*~\cite{DBLP:journals/corr/BhargavanDFHPRR17}.
This served as ground work for the cryptographic library HACL*~\cite{zinzindohoue2017hacl}
used in the NSS suite from Mozilla.

Benoit Viguier's avatar
Benoit Viguier committed
66
Coq not only allows verification but also synthesis~\cite{CpdtJFR}.
Peter Schwabe's avatar
Peter Schwabe committed
67
68
69
70
71
72
Erbsen, Philipoom, Gross, and Chlipala make use of it to have
correct-by-construction finite field arithmetic, which is used
to synthesize certified elliptic-curve crypto software~\cite{Philipoom2018CorrectbyconstructionFF,Erbsen2017CraftingCE,Erbsen2016SystematicSO}.
This software suite is now being used in BoringSSL~\cite{fiat-crypto}.

The verification approach has been used to prove the correctness of OpenSSL's
Benoit Viguier's avatar
Benoit Viguier committed
73
implementations of HMAC~\cite{Beringer2015VerifiedCA} and SHA-256~\cite{2015-Appel}.
Peter Schwabe's avatar
Peter Schwabe committed
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
In terms of languages and tooling, this work is closest to what we present here,
but our work considers an asymmetric primitive and provides computer-verified
proofs up to the mathematical definition of the group theory behind elliptic curves.

When considering the target of the verification effort, the closest work
to this paper is presented in~\cite{Chen2014VerifyingCS}, which presents
a mechanized proof of two assembly-level implementations of the core function of X25519.
Benoit Viguier's avatar
Benoit Viguier committed
81
82
The proof in~\cite{Chen2014VerifyingCS} takes a different approach from ours.
It uses heavy annotation of code together with SAT solvers;
Peter Schwabe's avatar
Peter Schwabe committed
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
also, it does not cover the full X25519 functionality and does
not make the link to the mathematical definition from~\cite{Ber06}.

%Synthesis approaches force the user to depend on generated code which may not
%be optimal (speed, compactness) and they require compiler tweaks in order
%to achieve the desired properties. On the other hand, carefully handcrafted
%optimized code forces the verifier to consider all the possible special cases
%and write a low-level specification of the details of the code in order to prove
%the correctness of the algorithm.

%It has to be noted that Curve25519 implementations have already been under scrutiny
%However in this paper we provide a proofs of correctness and soundness of a C program up to
%the theory of elliptic curves.
Benoit Viguier's avatar
Benoit Viguier committed
96

97
\subheading{Reproducing the proofs.}
Benoit Viguier's avatar
Benoit Viguier committed
98
To maximize reusability of our results we placed the code of our formal proof
Benoit Viguier's avatar
Benoit Viguier committed
99
presented in this paper into the public domain.
Benoit Viguier's avatar
Benoit Viguier committed
100
They are available at \url{https://anonfile.com/6fp8ta70n9/coq-verif-tweetnacl.tar_gz}
Benoit Viguier's avatar
Benoit Viguier committed
101
with instructions of how to compile and verify our proof.
Benoit Viguier's avatar
Benoit Viguier committed
102
103
A description of the content of the archive is provided in
Appendix~\ref{appendix:proof-folders}.
Benoit Viguier's avatar
done    
Benoit Viguier committed
104

105
\subheading{Organization of this paper.}
Peter Schwabe's avatar
Peter Schwabe committed
106
\sref{sec:preliminaries} gives the necessary background on Curve25519 and X25519
107
implementations and a brief explanation of how formal verification works.
Peter Schwabe's avatar
Peter Schwabe committed
108
109
110
\sref{sec:Coq-RFC} provides our Coq formalization of X25519 as specified in RFC~7748~\cite{rfc7748}.
\sref{sec:C-Coq} provides the specifications of X25519 in TweetNaCl and some of the
proof techniques used to show the correctness with respect to RFC~7748~\cite{rfc7748}.
Benoit Viguier's avatar
Benoit Viguier committed
111
\sref{sec:maths} describes our extension of the formal library by Bartzia
112
and Strub and the correctness of X25519 implementation with respect to Bernstein's
Benoit Viguier's avatar
WIP    
Benoit Viguier committed
113
specifications~\cite{Ber14}.
Peter Schwabe's avatar
Peter Schwabe committed
114
Finally in \sref{sec:Conclusion} we discuss the trusted code base of our proofs.
Benoit Viguier's avatar
Benoit Viguier committed
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
\fref{tikz:ProofOverview} shows a graph of dependencies of the proofs.

\begin{figure}[h]
  \centering
  \include{tikz/proof}
  \caption{Structure of the proof}
  \label{tikz:ProofOverview}
\end{figure}
Benoit Viguier's avatar
done    
Benoit Viguier committed
123

Benoit Viguier's avatar
forward    
Benoit Viguier committed
124

Benoit Viguier's avatar
forward    
Benoit Viguier committed
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
% Five years ago:
% \url{https://www.imperialviolet.org/2014/09/11/moveprovers.html}
% \url{https://www.imperialviolet.org/2014/09/07/provers.html}

% \section{Related Works}
%
% \begin{itemize}
%   \item HACL*
%   \item Proving SHA-256 and HMAC
%   \item \url{http://www.iis.sinica.edu.tw/~bywang/papers/ccs17.pdf}
%   \item \url{http://www.iis.sinica.edu.tw/~bywang/papers/ccs14.pdf}
%   \item \url{https://cryptojedi.org/crypto/#gfverif}
%   \item \url{https://cryptojedi.org/crypto/#verify25519}
%   \item Fiat Crypto : synthesis
% \end{itemize}
%
% Add comparison with Fiat-crypto