Commit 8b9f4c04 by Benoit Viguier

### more space, less details

parent 02d38ac7
 ... @@ -83,25 +83,15 @@ match m with ... @@ -83,25 +83,15 @@ match m with (a,b,c,d,e,f) (a,b,c,d,e,f) end. end. \end{lstlisting} \end{lstlisting} % The definitions of the encoding and decoding functions are detailed later % in this section. Our formalization differs slightly from the RFC. Indeed in order to optimize the Our formalization matches perfectly the RFC. In order to optimize the number of calls to \texttt{CSWAP} (defined in \sref{cswap}) number of calls to \texttt{CSWAP} (defined in \sref{cswap}) the RFC uses an additional variable to decide the RFC uses an additional variable to decide whether a conditional swap whether a conditional swap is required or not. Our description of the ladder is required or not, this differ from \aref{alg:montgomery-ladder}. follows strictly the shape of the exponent as described in \aref{alg:montgomery-ladder}. This divergence is allowed by the RFC: \emph{Note that these formulas are slightly different from Montgomery's original paper. Implementations are free to use any correct formulas.''}~\cite{rfc7748}. We later prove our ladder correct in that respect (\sref{sec:maths}). % TweetNaCl implements X25519 with numbers represented as arrays. Later in our proof we use a simpler description of the ladder % RFC~7748 defines X25519 over field elements. We show the equivalence between (\coqe{montgomery_rec}) which follows strictly the shape of % the different number representations. To simplify our proof, we define operations the exponent and prove those ladder equivalent. % used in the ladder over generic types \coqe{T} and \coqe{T'}. % Those types are later instantiated as list of integers, integers, natural % numbers, or field elements. \emph{To implement the X25519(k, u) [...] functions (where k is \emph{To implement the X25519(k, u) [...] functions (where k is the scalar and u is the u-coordinate), first decode k and u and then the scalar and u is the u-coordinate), first decode k and u and then ... @@ -109,11 +99,6 @@ perform the following procedure, which is taken from [curve25519] and ... @@ -109,11 +99,6 @@ perform the following procedure, which is taken from [curve25519] and based on formulas from [montgomery]. All calculations are performed based on formulas from [montgomery]. All calculations are performed in GF(p), i.e., they are performed modulo p.''}~\cite{rfc7748} in GF(p), i.e., they are performed modulo p.''}~\cite{rfc7748} % In TweetNaCl, as described in \sref{subsec:Number-TweetNaCl}, % elements of $\F{p}$ are represented as big integers using radix $2^{16}$. % We use a direct mapping to represent such an array of limbs % as a list of integers in Coq. % RFC~7748 states that \emph{All calculations are performed in GF(p), i.e., they are performed modulo p.''} Operations used in the Montgomery ladder of \coqe{RFC} are performed on Operations used in the Montgomery ladder of \coqe{RFC} are performed on integers (See Appendix~\ref{subsubsec:RFC-Coq}). integers (See Appendix~\ref{subsubsec:RFC-Coq}). The reduction modulo $\p$ is deferred to the very end as part of the The reduction modulo $\p$ is deferred to the very end as part of the ... @@ -122,7 +107,6 @@ We define the little-endian projection to integers as follows. ... @@ -122,7 +107,6 @@ We define the little-endian projection to integers as follows. \begin{dfn} \begin{dfn} Let \Coqe{ZofList} : $\Z \rightarrow \texttt{list}~\Z \rightarrow \Z$, Let \Coqe{ZofList} : $\Z \rightarrow \texttt{list}~\Z \rightarrow \Z$, a function given $n$ and a list $l$ returns its little endian decoding with radix $2^n$. a function given $n$ and a list $l$ returns its little endian decoding with radix $2^n$. % We define it in Coq as: \end{dfn} \end{dfn} \begin{lstlisting}[language=Coq,aboveskip=0pt,belowskip=1pt] \begin{lstlisting}[language=Coq,aboveskip=0pt,belowskip=1pt] Fixpoint ZofList {n:Z} (a:list Z) : Z := Fixpoint ZofList {n:Z} (a:list Z) : Z := ... ...
 ... @@ -280,43 +280,48 @@ differential additions and point doublings using projective coordinates. ... @@ -280,43 +280,48 @@ differential additions and point doublings using projective coordinates. By taking \aref{alg:montgomery-ladder} and replacing \texttt{xDBL\&ADD} by a By taking \aref{alg:montgomery-ladder} and replacing \texttt{xDBL\&ADD} by a combination of the formulae from \lref{lemma:xADD} and \lref{lemma:xDBL}, combination of the formulae from \lref{lemma:xADD} and \lref{lemma:xDBL}, we define a ladder \coqe{opt_montgomery} (in which $\K$ has not been fixed yet), we define a ladder \coqe{opt_montgomery} (in which $\K$ has not been fixed yet). similar to the one used in TweetNaCl. % similar to the one used in TweetNaCl (with \coqe{montgomery_rec}). This definition is closely related to \coqe{montgomery_rec_swap} that was used % shown above. in the definition of \coqe{RFC}, and is easily proved to correspond to it. In Coq this correspondence proof is hidden in the proof of \coqe{RFC_Correct} shown above. % We prove its correctness for any point whose \xcoord is not 0. % % \begin{lstlisting}[language=Coq,belowskip=-0.25 \baselineskip] % Lemma opt_montgomery_x : % forall (n m : nat) (x : K), % n < 2^m -> x != 0 -> % forall (p : mc M), p#x0 = x -> % opt_montgomery n m x = (p *+ n)#x0. % \end{lstlisting} % We can remark that for an input $x = 0$, the ladder returns $0$. % \begin{lstlisting}[language=Coq,belowskip=-0.25 \baselineskip] % Lemma opt_montgomery_0: % forall (n m : nat), opt_montgomery n m 0 = 0. % \end{lstlisting} % Also \Oinf\ is the neutral element of $M_{a,b}(\K)$. % \begin{lstlisting}[language=Coq,belowskip=-0.25 \baselineskip] % Lemma p_x0_0_eq_0 : forall (n : nat) (p : mc M), % p #x0 = 0%:R -> (p *+ n) #x0 = 0%R. % \end{lstlisting} % This gives us the theorem of the correctness of the Montgomery ladder. We prove its correctness for any point whose \xcoord is not 0. \begin{lstlisting}[language=Coq,belowskip=-0.25 \baselineskip] Lemma opt_montgomery_x : forall (n m : nat) (x : K), n < 2^m -> x != 0 -> forall (p : mc M), p#x0 = x -> opt_montgomery n m x = (p *+ n)#x0. \end{lstlisting} We can remark that for an input $x = 0$, the ladder returns $0$. \begin{lstlisting}[language=Coq,belowskip=-0.25 \baselineskip] Lemma opt_montgomery_0: forall (n m : nat), opt_montgomery n m 0 = 0. \end{lstlisting} Also \Oinf\ is the neutral element of $M_{a,b}(\K)$. \begin{lstlisting}[language=Coq,belowskip=-0.25 \baselineskip] Lemma p_x0_0_eq_0 : forall (n : nat) (p : mc M), p #x0 = 0%:R -> (p *+ n) #x0 = 0%R. \end{lstlisting} This gives us the theorem of the correctness of the Montgomery ladder. This gives us the theorem of the correctness of the Montgomery ladder. \begin{theorem} \begin{theorem} \label{thm:montgomery-ladder-correct} \label{thm:montgomery-ladder-correct} For all $n, m \in \N$, $x \in \K$, $P \in M_{a,b}(\K)$, For all $n, m \in \N$, $x \in \K$, $P \in M_{a,b}(\K)$, if $\chi_0(P) = x$ then \coqe{opt_montgomery} returns $\chi_0(n \cdot P)$ if $\chi_0(P) = x$ then \coqe{opt_montgomery} returns $\chi_0(n \cdot P)$ \end{theorem} \end{theorem} \begin{lstlisting}[language=Coq,belowskip=-0.5 \baselineskip] \begin{lstlisting}[language=Coq] Theorem opt_montgomery_ok (n m: nat) (x : K) : Theorem opt_montgomery_ok (n m: nat) (x : K) : n < 2^m -> n < 2^m -> forall (p : mc M), p#x0 = x -> forall (p : mc M), p#x0 = x -> opt_montgomery n m x = (p *+ n)#x0. opt_montgomery n m x = (p *+ n)#x0. \end{lstlisting} \end{lstlisting} The definition of \coqe{opt_montgomery} is closely related to \coqe{montgomery_rec_swap} that was used in \coqe{RFC}. We proved their equivalence, and used it in our final proof of \coqe{Theorem RFC_Correct}. \subsection{Curves, twists and extension fields} \subsection{Curves, twists and extension fields} \label{subsec:curve_twist_fields} \label{subsec:curve_twist_fields} ... ...
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment