Skip to content
GitLab
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Help
Support
Community forum
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in
Toggle navigation
C
c2-planning-scheduling-paper
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Service Desk
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Operations
Operations
Incidents
Environments
Analytics
Analytics
CI / CD
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
Markus Klinik
c2-planning-scheduling-paper
Commits
afc96d05
Commit
afc96d05
authored
May 21, 2019
by
Markus Klinik
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
related work: wording
parent
b3ed6cd4
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
1 addition
and
1 deletion
+1
-1
related-work.tex
related-work.tex
+1
-1
No files found.
related-work.tex
View file @
afc96d05
...
...
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ One of his supervisors wrote her Ph.D. thesis about solving the MSRCPSP \cite{Mo
\citet
{
Artigues2008
}
has written a book about the resource-constrained scheduling problem, which contains a chapter about the multi-skill variant.
To the best of our knowledge,
\citet
{
CorreiaLS2012
}
are
the first ones to study solving the multi-skill variant of the RCPSP.
\citet
{
CorreiaLS2012
}
were among
the first ones to study solving the multi-skill variant of the RCPSP.
In this publication, they call it RCPSP with flexible resources.
\citet
{
AlmeidaCS2016
}
present a parallel scheduling heuristic to solve the MSRCPSP, and conduct computer experiments to validate their approach.
Recently they used a genetic algorithm to solve the MSRCPSP
\cite
{
AlmeidaCS2018
}
.
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment