fixed problem in quiescence reducibility check

learning/observationtable.py

@@ -252,9 +252,7 @@ class Table:
         past = set()
         # filter rows
         for row1 in filter(rowsWithQuiescence, self._rowsInS):
-            print(str(chaos)+" Row1: " + str(row1))
-            print(self._entries[row1])
-            row1Extended = row1 + (self._quiescence,)
+            row1Extended = th.flatten(row1 + (self._quiescence,), self._quiescence)
             # filter for rows in top part of the table that are
             # moreSpecific than row1Extended,
             moreSpecific = lambda x: lambda y: self._moreSpecificRow(y, x, chaos)
@@ -262,15 +260,9 @@ class Table:
 
             #  I want the most specific one
             row2 = listOfRows.pop()
-            print(str(chaos)+" Less specific: " + str(row1Extended))
-            print(self._entries[row1Extended])
-            print(str(chaos)+" Temporary more specific: " + str(row2))
-            print(self._entries[row2])
             for row in listOfRows:
                 if self._moreSpecificRow(row, row2, chaos):
                     row2 = row
-            print(str(chaos)+" Most specific: "+ str(row2))
-            print(self._entries[row2])
             if row1 == row2:
                 # same row, simulation is trivial
                 continue
@@ -281,7 +273,6 @@ class Table:
 
             wait = set()
             wait.add((row1, row2, ()))
-            print("Added: "+ str((row1, row2, ())))
             while wait:
                 current = wait.pop()
                 past.add((current[0],current[1]))