Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 858df2f0 authored by Daan Sprenkels's avatar Daan Sprenkels
Browse files

Fix AuCPake benchmark

During writing, I made the mistake and assumed that our STM32F407
benchmark would run at 84 MHz. However, we opted to choose the
default clocking profile instead. After assuring this for our own
benchmark, I forgot to update the AuCPake cycle count.

We should take the 16 MHz cc measurement though, because it better
resembles our own benchmarking setup.

Thanks to Matthias for finding this mistake.
parent 145abd1e
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ none of our implementations exceed the performance of Curve25519.
% Their code is at https://github.com/armfazh/rfc7748_precomputed
% So in <https://hyperelliptic.org/tanja/lc17/ascrypto/day1/slides/lopez-software.pdf> Lopez reports 127kcc, using MULX+ADCX/ADOX, but Haswell does not support ADX (only BMI2).
Curve25519~(\cite{FA17}) & -- & -- & -- & $907\,240$\tmark[a]\\
Curve25519~(\cite{HL19}) & -- & -- & -- & $626\,719$\tmark[a]\\
Curve25519~(\cite{HL19}) & -- & -- & -- & $625\,358$\tmark[a]\\
Curve13318~(\textbf{this work}) & $389\,546$\tmark[b] & $382\,966$\tmark[b] & $204\,643$\tmark[b] & $1\,797\,451$\tmark[b] \\
Ed25519 verify & $221\,988$\tmark[d] & $206\,080$\tmark[d] & $184\,052$\tmark[d] & -- \\
% SB: SUPERCOP h6sandy
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment